Connect Engage Share

Social Networking Image2 300x229 Connect Engage Share I want to thank Thomas Power for nagging me on several occasions to do something with the Connect, Engage, Share(CES) model. I was, and still am, very wary of just adding more noise into the Social Media (SM) world but he convinced me that the model has something useful to contribute. This article is about the spirit of CES and is made up of a number of things I’ve discovered the hard way.

It’s the People! SM is not about the technology, whether that be hardware or software. It’s about people. This may appear to be self-evident but there is a lot of bandwidth wasted on discussions about the newest tweak to this or that. SM is a set of tools that allow you to communicate, to connect, engage and share and thus to build relationships.

Just because you can doesn’t mean you should. I’ve lost count of the number of different Social Media Sites out there but I recently came across software offering to connect you automatically to the top 250 Social Media sites. You provide a profile and a CSV file of members from an existing network and it does the rest. But then what? The software makes the initial connections but how do you engage and share across all of those sites? Most of us have to work for a living away from SM. If you spread yourself that thinly, where will you find the time to connect, engage and share in a meaningful way? And how does it look if your profile on a site reveals your background, some contacts and perhaps one or two posts, the last of which was written 3 months ago?

Connect, engage and share with “real” people. It’s easy for many of us to spend much of our time communicating geek to geek and forgetting “real” people. It doesn’t matter whether you are one of the well-informed minority or the “What’s this all about” majority. We all know how to communicate – SM merely provides a different set of tools. Connecting with people, engaging them in conversation in a natural way and sharing knowledge will allow you to build a deeper connection, engage on a deeper level, share more information and so on, round and round, building what Thomas Power calls “Connectedness”.

Only automate when necessary. Whilst technology helps us to be more efficient, it should never replace human interaction.  It’s a fine line – auto-responders to advise someone who has emailed you that you are out of the office makes sense. But remember, even Gary Vaynerchuk commits himself to answering every e-mail he receives! There are people in leadership positions in the SM world who never reply to e-mails or personal messages. There’s a real risk of them appearing to be incongruent.

Similarly, I’m amazed at the number of people who post articles on their own blogs and on sites like ecademy and never reply to comments. To me, this has nothing to do with social media or networking: it’s plain, old-fashioned courtesy!

Never Mind the Width, Where’s the Depth? I often ask myself whether, with the benefit of hindsight, I’d have joined the auto-connect experiment on ecademy. I would, but only because I believe that soon, we will be given the tools to enable us to create clusters of members within our networks around keyword searches.

Let’s say I want to engage with people in my network who, for example, live in the South West, are healers with an interest in Chinese Medicine and in using modern technology to enhance healing. I should be able to enter those keywords within my network, identify those who fit the description and then send them a message. At the moment, this is not possible on any site of which I’m aware.

Real Time Relationships are Still The Most Important Ones. How many of us have heard comments from loved ones like “Are you on Facebook/ecademy/LinkedIn/that blog again?” or “You spend more time with your on-line networks than you do with me!” Unless you are very disciplined, it’s easy to drift into this habit. I wonder how long it will be before “Too much time on-line” will be seen as a justified reason for a partner’s filing for divorce?

Be Yourself. Have you noticed how many cloned sites there are out there? Sing your song, with your voice and don’t be afraid to be different! People will connect and engage with others with whom they feel comfortable. Fakes are spotted sooner or later and it’s difficult to feel comfortable with someone who’s a fake.

Communicate Rather than Broadcast. This takes me full circle. Membership of too many sites leads to a situation  in which it’s impossible to engage in meaningful 2 way communication with people. You end up either “broadcasting” rather than “communicating” or neglecting people, which is a surefire way to kill relationships.

Nick Tadd made an enigmatic comment on Tuesday suggesting he had learned much about this on  his recent trip to the USA and I hope he jumps in here. Whether he does or not, have I missed anything out? What are the lessons you have learned about Connecting, Engaging and Sharing?

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Connect – Engage – Share and a Cautionary Tale. Penny Power’s 3 step social networking model is powrful because...
  2. The Forgotten Words of Networking How would you feel if, as soon as they met...
  3. My Personal Development and an Experiment in Managing SM Time Social Media and Social Networking are fun, rewarding and can...
  4. Social Media – Building Successful Relationships I often find myself talking with those who went to...
  5. Nourishing the ‘we’ in the web I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the strength of...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

4 Responses to “Connect Engage Share”

  1. Thanks Nic, great perspective on CES. I find these acronyms very useful, they are short and sweet and enable us to keep it simple.

    I would add to your point about automation. Most of these platforms enable us to integrate and automate. Sharing is good, yes ! But you can share too much, especially if it is to the same audience on different platforms.

    The platforms make it so easy I think it can be easy to forget that your readers may get bored with your relentless conversations if they see the same ones on different platforms.

    For instance : You can push your FriendFeed stream and/or your Twitter stream onto Facebook quite easily. To my way of thinking this is using your conversation on FriendFeed or Twitter to broadcast on Facebook, and if you are friends on Facebook with anyone who does this, you will know how boring it is (and you may know that you simply block that FriendFeed application from facebook and never see it again :-) )

    Full circle again back to communication !

    Phil

  2. Phil

    Excellent point and I agree with you 100%! Thanks for taking the time to comment,

    Keep Well

    Nic

  3. Hi Nic,

    Connect, engage and share…isn’t that what neighbors do when they want to discuss noisy garbage trucks that arrive too early in the morning or speeding cars that make the streets unsafe for children and others?

    In my limited world, smaller networks that enable discussions that are relevant to me are better places for me to spend time, which is very precious.

    However, perhaps I am missing the point. Perhaps the real essence is in the definition of the group one wishes to follow and with which to become associated. In my view, being connected with 20,000 followers is “heady” but not relevant. To others, clearly there is relevance on at least one level.

    Regardless, in my view Connecting, Sharing and Exchanging are keys to social networking in any setting, and I could not agree with you more.

    Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts on this subject, Nic.

  4. Bob,

    You got it! There is nothing new in CES because there is nothing inherently new in Social Networking. The technology may give us new tools, but the keys to effective social networking are the same as they always were!

    Thanks for commenting,

    Nic

Leave a Reply